Do infants compare ratios or use simpler heuristics in probabilistic inference?

نویسندگان

  • Samantha Gualtieri
  • Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz
  • Stephanie Denison
چکیده

Empirical evidence suggests infants can make inferences about uncertain future events using probabilistic data (Denison & Xu, 2010; Teglas et al., 2007). However, it is unclear if infants are using information about proportions to make these decisions. Infants were presented with population jars that contained large distributions of objects, and were tasked with deciding which of the two jars was more likely to yield a desirable object on a single draw. In Experiment 1, most infants chose the jar that contained only preferred objects over a jar that contained a 3:1 ratio of preferred objects. Most infants also made the correct choice when presented with the reverse ratios (choosing a 1:3 over a 0:1 ratio). In Experiment 2, infants correctly chose the jar that contained a 4:1 ratio of preferred objects over a jar that contained a 1.5:1 ratio. However, infants performed at chance when presented with the reverse ratios.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evolutionary Triplet Models of Structured RNA

The reconstruction and synthesis of ancestral RNAs is a feasible goal for paleogenetics. This will require new bioinformatics methods, including a robust statistical framework for reconstructing histories of substitutions, indels and structural changes. We describe a "transducer composition" algorithm for extending pairwise probabilistic models of RNA structural evolution to models of multiple ...

متن کامل

Joint Probabilistic Inference of Causal Structure

Causal directed acyclic graphical models (DAGs) are powerful reasoning tools in the study and estimation of cause and effect in scientific and socio-behavioral phenomena. In many domains where the cause and effect structure is unknown, a key challenge in studying causality with DAGs is learning the structure of causal graphs directly from observational data. Traditional approaches to causal str...

متن کامل

The probable and the possible at 12 months: intuitive reasoning about the uncertain future.

How do infants predict the next future event, when such a prediction requires estimating the event's probability? The literature suggests that adult humans often fail this task because their probability estimates are affected by heuristics and biases or because they can reason about the frequency of classes of events but not about the probability of single events. Recent evidence suggests inste...

متن کامل

Young children do not succeed in choice tasks that imply evaluating chances.

Preverbal infants manifest probabilistic intuitions in their reactions to the outcomes of simple physical processes and in their choices. Their ability conflicts with the evidence that, before the age of about 5years, children's verbal judgments do not reveal probability understanding. To assess these conflicting results, three studies tested 3-5-year-olds on choice tasks on which infants perfo...

متن کامل

Bayesian probability estimates are not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes’ rule in elementary situations

This paper has two aims. First, we investigate how often people make choices conforming to Bayes' rule when natural sampling is applied. Second, we show that using Bayes' rule is not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes' rule. Simpler methods, even fallacious heuristics, might prescribe correct choices reasonably often under specific circumstances. We considered elementary situations with...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015